| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 27 | 41 | 39 | 80 | 2.963 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 23 | 16 | 30 | 46 | 2.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SR | 34 | 38 | 48 | 86 | 2.529 |
| 2008-09 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 32 | 41 | 37 | 78 | 2.438 |
| 2007-08 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SO | 33 | 40 | 25 | 65 | 1.970 |
| 2006-07 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 35 | 38 | 36 | 74 | 2.114 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.