icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 27 | 11 | 21 | 32 | 1.185 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 15 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.333 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Boston Pride | PHF | 16 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.875 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Boston Pride | PHF | 16 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.875 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Boston Pride | PHF | 15 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 1.067 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | SR | 38 | 30 | 27 | 57 | 1.500 |
| 2007-08 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | JR | 38 | 23 | 31 | 54 | 1.421 |
| 2006-07 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | SO | 35 | 18 | 20 | 38 | 1.086 |
| 2005-06 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | FR | 41 | 16 | 30 | 46 | 1.122 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.