icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 25 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 0.720 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 20 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.450 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SR | 34 | 25 | 33 | 58 | 1.706 |
| 2009-10 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 33 | 20 | 45 | 65 | 1.970 |
| 2008-09 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SO | 37 | 27 | 35 | 62 | 1.676 |
| 2007-08 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 37 | 13 | 27 | 40 | 1.081 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.