| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 27 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.444 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 40 | 10 | 26 | 36 | 0.900 |
| 2008-09 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 36 | 10 | 27 | 37 | 1.028 |
| 2007-08 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 36 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 1.194 |
| 2006-07 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 35 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.886 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.