icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 14 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.929 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 7 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.857 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Buffalo Beauts | PHF | 13 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 1.231 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Boston Pride | PHF | 17 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 1.177 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-W | SR | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| 2008-09 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-W | JR | 40 | 23 | 33 | 56 | 1.400 |
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-W | SO | 19 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 1.158 |
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-W | FR | 17 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 1.176 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.