| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | — | CWHL | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | SR | 28 | 19 | 19 | 38 | 1.357 |
| 2006-07 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | JR | 20 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 1.600 |
| 2005-06 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 20 | 26 | 46 | 1.840 |
| 2004-05 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | FR | 28 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 1.107 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.