IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hilary Knight Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-12 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Seattle Torrent · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Connecticut Polar Bears 19U 19U-AAA-W 33 55 26 81 2.454 0.8480 0.8710 — —
2012-13 Worcester Blades CWHL 24 17 15 32 1.333 — — — —
2013-14 Worcester Blades CWHL 4 4 4 8 2.000 — — — —
2014-15 Worcester Blades CWHL 13 8 14 22 1.692 — — — —
2015-16 Boston Pride PHF 17 15 18 33 1.941 — — — —
2016-17 Boston Pride PHF 10 8 7 15 1.500 — — — —
2017-18 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2019-20 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2020-21 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2021-22 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2022-23 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2023-24 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
2024-25 Boston Fleet PWHL 30 15 14 29 0.967 — — — —
2025-26 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 23 8 9 17 0.739 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W SR 40 31 29 60 1.500
2010-11 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W JR 1 0 1 1 1.000
2008-09 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W SO 38 45 37 82 2.158
2007-08 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W FR 19 9 6 15 0.789
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.87
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2007-08 · Wisconsin
-9.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#123
Forward overall
#6
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.