| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 24 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.583 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Buffalo Beauts | PHF | 10 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 2.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Buffalo Beauts | PHF | 8 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 1.250 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SR | 34 | 33 | 20 | 53 | 1.559 |
| 2010-11 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 33 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 0.879 |
| 2009-10 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | SO | 36 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 0.778 |
| 2008-09 | Mercyhurst | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 37 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.595 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.