icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Rivers | NE-Prep-Girls | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Rivers | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 24 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.167 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 22 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.864 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Boston Pride | PHF | 18 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.778 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Boston Pride | PHF | 17 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.882 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Boston Pride | PHF | 16 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.938 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Boston Pride | PHF | 16 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 0.875 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 17 | 23 | 40 | 1.667 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Boston Pride | PHF | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.857 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Boston Pride | PHF | 20 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.700 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.167 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.167 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.167 | — | — | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.167 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 34 | 24 | 21 | 45 | 1.324 |
| 2011-12 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 28 | 25 | 18 | 43 | 1.536 |
| 2010-11 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 30 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 0.800 |
| 2009-10 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 33 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 0.818 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.