← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Pickett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-12-14 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Worcester Blades · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 St. Mark's NE-Prep-Girls 15 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 St. Mark's NE-Prep-Girls 23 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 St. Mark's NE-Prep-Girls 16 5 0 5 0.310 0.1426 0.1426
2013-14 Worcester Blades CWHL 22 9 6 15 0.682
2014-15 Worcester Blades CWHL 21 6 2 8 0.381
2015-16 Boston Pride PHF 7 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Worcester Blades CWHL 3 1 1 2 0.667
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SR 36 21 26 47 1.306
2011-12 Northeastern D1 HEA-W JR 33 18 23 41 1.242
2010-11 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SO 37 10 10 20 0.540
2009-10 Northeastern D1 HEA-W FR 33 10 7 17 0.515
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2009-10 · Northeastern
+321.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10453
Forward overall
#31
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.