IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenelle Kohanchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
MoDo Hockey · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Toronto Furies CWHL 14 7 3 10 0.714 — — — —
2014-15 Toronto Furies CWHL 21 7 10 17 0.809 — — — —
2016-17 Toronto Furies CWHL 22 3 7 10 0.455 — — — —
2017-18 MoDo Hockey SDHL 27 17 15 32 1.185 1.3689 1.0689 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Boston University D1 HEA-W SR 35 25 21 46 1.314
2011-12 Boston University D1 HEA-W SR 7 4 5 9 1.286
2010-11 Boston University D1 HEA-W JR 36 10 21 31 0.861
2009-10 Boston University D1 HEA-W SO 27 12 9 21 0.778
2008-09 Boston University D1 HEA-W FR 28 15 16 31 1.107

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 9 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24
Forward overall
#2
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.