IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lisa Mullan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-14 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Furies · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Proctor NE-Prep-Girls 24 17 2 19 0.790 0.3635 0.3635 — —
2013-14 Toronto Furies CWHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2010-11 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2009-10 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SO 36 11 8 19 0.528
2008-09 Syracuse D1 CHA-W FR 28 5 14 19 0.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2008-09 · Syracuse
+118.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1416
Forward overall
#24
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.