← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Lee Rattray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-30 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
1.16
Elite (0.70+)
Base NCAAe-W PPG1.3484
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used0

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
2.60
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG3.0407
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used0

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2014-15 Markham Thunder CWHL 22 4 9 13 0.591 N/A N/A
2015-16 Markham Thunder CWHL 22 13 16 29 1.318 N/A N/A
2016-17 Markham Thunder CWHL 22 11 10 21 0.955 N/A N/A
2018-19 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2019-20 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2020-21 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2021-22 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2022-23 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2023-24 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 12 13 25 0.962 N/A N/A
2024-25 Boston Fleet PWHL 30 4 6 10 0.333 N/A N/A
2025-26 Boston Fleet PWHL 30 4 8 12 0.400 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2013-14 Clarkson ECAC-W SR 41 29 37 66 1.610
2012-13 Clarkson ECAC-W JR 36 22 30 52 1.444
2011-12 Clarkson ECAC-W SO 24 12 15 27 1.125
2010-11 Clarkson ECAC-W FR 37 7 18 25 0.676

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.