← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaitlyn Tougas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-05 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
MoDo Hockey · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Markham Thunder CWHL 23 1 0 1 0.043
2017-18 MoDo Hockey SDHL 33 10 19 29 0.879 1.0150 1.0001
2018-19 MoDo Hockey SDHL 36 20 30 50 1.389 1.6042 1.5197
2019-20 HV71 SDHL 36 14 35 49 1.361 1.5721 1.5721
2021-22 MoDo Hockey SDHL 35 12 19 31 0.886 1.0230 0.8355
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 36 8 21 29 0.806
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 36 8 21 29 0.806
2013-14 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 39 13 14 27 0.692
2012-13 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 35 8 14 22 0.629
2011-12 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 30 7 7 14 0.467

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 15 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
7%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
93%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28
Forward overall
#5
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.