← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shannon Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Furies · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Linköping HC SDHL 35 15 11 26 0.743 0.8688 0.8539
2018-19 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2019-20 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2020-21 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2021-22 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2022-23 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2023-24 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
2025-26 Toronto Furies CWHL 27 4 4 8 0.296
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Plattsburgh D3 SR 30 20 26 46 1.533
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SR 30 20 26 46 1.533
2013-14 Plattsburgh D3 JR 29 16 18 34 1.172
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 JR 29 16 18 34 1.172
2012-13 Plattsburgh D3 SO 30 21 18 39 1.300
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 30 21 18 39 1.300
2011-12 Plattsburgh D3 FR 30 10 15 25 0.833
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 30 10 15 25 0.833

NCAAe Rankings

#115
Forward overall
#2
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Yale ·
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.