IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geneviève Bannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Montréal Canadiennes · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Göteborg HC SDHL 34 18 15 33 0.971 1.1210 1.1184 — —
2018-19 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2019-20 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2020-21 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2021-22 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2022-23 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2023-24 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
2025-26 Montréal Canadiennes CWHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 41 15 38 53 1.293
2015-16 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 40 11 27 38 0.950
2014-15 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 38 13 19 32 0.842
2013-14 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 41 10 17 27 0.659

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 28 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49
Forward overall
#3
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.