IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayley Walsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 West Fargo High USHS-W 26 9 16 25 0.962 0.2891 0.2891 — —
2011-12 West Fargo High USHS-W 26 34 17 51 1.962 0.5898 0.5898 — —
2012-13 West Fargo High USHS-W 25 44 46 90 3.600 1.0825 1.0825 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 31 1 5 6 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.88
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2013-14 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-78.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#203
Forward overall
#48
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.10 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.94 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Abby Hansberger
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Remington
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Boric
Plattsburgh · 2018-19
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.