IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hailey Adair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 11 8 19 0.760 0.2285 0.2285 — —
2011-12 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 19 19 38 1.520 0.4571 0.4571 — —
2012-13 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 17 15 32 1.280 0.3849 0.3849 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 6 8 14 0.519
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 9 17 26 0.963
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 6 11 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Superior
+77.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1448
Forward overall
#495
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Lemker
Saint Benedict · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jillian Tabaka
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Gaffney
Hamline · 2015-16
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.