IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hailey Rock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Croix Valley Fusion USHS-W 24 33 21 54 2.250 0.6766 0.6766 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 28 4 8 12 0.429
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 0 1 1 0.036
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 29 3 5 8 0.276
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 NCHA FR 20 4 0 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.63
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-68.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#280
Forward overall
#71
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Hantge
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
1.417 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bre Simon
Hamline · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hailey Adair
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.