IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kassie Lien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 WSFLG Blizzard USHS-W 24 27 24 51 2.125 0.6390 0.6390 — —
2012-13 WSFLG Blizzard USHS-W 22 24 13 37 1.682 0.5057 0.5057 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 23 7 6 13 0.565
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 5 7 12 0.480
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 26 5 7 12 0.462
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 7 3 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2013-14 · Saint Mary's (MN)
-19.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#501
Forward overall
#158
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maddie McCollins
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Presleigh Giesbrecht
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Leary
Utica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.