← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan McKim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 36 17 20 37 1.028 0.2992 0.2992
2013-14 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0291 0.0291
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 23 1 1 2 0.087
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2014-15 · Cornell
-25.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5911
Forward overall
#2055
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.