IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelsey Rafferty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 20 12 6 18 0.900 0.2706 0.2706 — —
2012-13 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 23 16 20 36 1.565 0.4707 0.4707 — —
2013-14 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 22 42 23 65 2.954 0.8884 0.8884 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 22 4 7 11 0.500
2014-15 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 11 6 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.67
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2014-15 · Hamline
+1.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#385
Forward overall
#104
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.94 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hailey Herdine
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bella Wagner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Wittig
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.