IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kourtney Menches Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 53 3 6 9 0.170 0.0494 0.0494 — —
2013-14 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 44 4 11 15 0.341 0.0992 0.0992 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Vermont D1 HEA-W SR 28 3 9 12 0.429
2016-17 Vermont D1 HEA-W JR 34 5 3 8 0.235
2015-16 Vermont D1 HEA-W SO 37 1 0 1 0.027
2014-15 Vermont D1 HEA-W FR 36 0 3 3 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2014-15 · Vermont
+22.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9361
Forward overall
#3187
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Joie Phelps
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Madison Oelkers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joie Phelps
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Oelkers
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.