IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Detert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Northern Edge USHS-W 20 24 12 36 1.800 0.5240 0.5240 — —
2013-14 Northern Edge USHS-W 24 36 24 60 2.500 0.7278 0.7278 — —
2014-15 Northern Edge USHS-W 23 46 22 68 2.957 0.8606 0.8606 — —
2015-16 Northern Edge USHS-W 20 44 16 60 3.000 0.8733 0.8733 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 27 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 20 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 21 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#129
Forward overall
#21
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.