IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katelynn Russ Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-23 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Boston Pride · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Upper Fox Valley USHS-W 14 12 11 23 1.643 0.4782 0.5120 — —
2013-14 Upper Fox Valley USHS-W 12 17 11 28 2.333 0.6792 0.6929 — —
2014-15 Upper Fox Valley USHS-W 10 13 8 21 2.100 0.6113 0.5943 — —
2019-20 Connecticut Whale PHF 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Connecticut Whale PHF 4 2 0 2 0.500 — — — —
2021-22 Boston Pride PHF 20 0 2 2 0.100 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC-W SR 34 8 4 12 0.353
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC-W JR 33 5 6 11 0.333
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC-W SO 34 16 8 24 0.706
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC-W FR 34 4 5 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.59
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Union
-55.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#367
Forward overall
#15
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.