| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Plymouth/Canton/Salem High | USHS-W | 19 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.316 | 0.0950 | 0.0963 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Plymouth/Canton/Salem High | USHS-W | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 | 0.0188 | 0.0181 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Plymouth/Canton/Salem High | USHS-W | 11 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.364 | 0.1093 | 0.1000 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SR | 31 | 11 | 28 | 39 | 1.258 |
| 2016-17 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 34 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.118 |
| 2015-16 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | JR | 29 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 1.069 |
| 2015-16 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 31 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.129 |
| 2014-15 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SO | 26 | 2 | 14 | 16 | 0.615 |
| 2014-15 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 33 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.212 |
| 2013-14 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | FR | 18 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.444 |
| 2013-14 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.059 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.