← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Plymouth/Canton/Salem High USHS-W 19 0 6 6 0.316 0.0950 0.0963
2013-14 Plymouth/Canton/Salem High USHS-W 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0188 0.0181
2014-15 Plymouth/Canton/Salem High USHS-W 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1093 0.1000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 31 11 28 39 1.258
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 34 0 4 4 0.118
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 29 8 23 31 1.069
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 26 2 14 16 0.615
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SO 33 4 3 7 0.212
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 18 4 4 8 0.444
2013-14 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 34 0 2 2 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2013-14 · Adrian
+438.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9841
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 1997
#3268
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2013-14
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.