← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Bailey Knight Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.02
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0243
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.06
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0690
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Hudson High USHS-W 17 2 3 5 0.294 0.0243 0.0243
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2026-27 Syracuse CHA-W — 0 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Olivia Arkell USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Mallory Rushton NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG 0.125 RIT
Megan Berg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Stella Haberman USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.125 RIT
Katie Huntington USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Alexis Larsen 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG 0.083 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Astrid Wilbur 2023-24 · 0.23 PPG 0.292 Hood College UCHC
Emma Ramstorf 2024-25 · 0.81 PPG 0.087 Hamline MIAC
Johanna Eidensten 2011-12 · 0.16 PPG 0.429 Elmira UCHC
Mackenzie Igel-Harris 2022-23 · 0.14 PPG — Lawrence NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.