IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makenna Webster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 62 31 30 61 0.984 0.2864 0.3188 — —
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 60 47 56 103 1.717 0.4997 0.5324 — —
2018-19 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 40 19 42 61 1.525 0.4439 0.4387 — —
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 50 39 45 84 1.680 0.4890 0.4890 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W SR 30 12 23 35 1.167
2023-24 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W JR 31 12 14 26 0.839
2022-23 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W SO 31 15 24 39 1.258
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 — — 38 23 30 53 1.395
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 — — 21 8 5 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Wisconsin
+51.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#746
Forward overall
#32
Forward born in 2002
#255
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.