IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jess Ciarrocchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bayard Rustin High USHS-W 14 45 2 47 3.357 0.9773 1.0846 — —
2016-17 Bayard Rustin High USHS-W 15 33 14 47 3.133 0.9121 0.9687 — —
2018-19 The Hill School USHS-W 29 5 22 27 0.931 0.2710 0.2669 — —
2019-20 The Hill School USHS-W 26 14 18 32 1.231 0.3583 0.3583 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W — 36 7 2 9 0.250
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC-W SR 28 5 2 7 0.250
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC-W JR 31 2 2 4 0.129
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC-W SO 10 0 4 4 0.400
2021-22 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 22 0 1 1 0.045
2020-21 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 21 3 5 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2020-21 · Penn State
-25.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#853
Forward overall
#40
Forward born in 2002
#286
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Christi Vetter
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christi Vetter
Penn State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Charly Dalhquist
North Dakota ·
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.