IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Welch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Newton Country Day NE-Prep-Girls 15 14 16 30 2.000 0.9202 0.9202 — —
2014-15 Andover NE-Prep-Girls 25 5 2 7 0.280 0.1288 0.1288 — —
2015-16 Andover NE-Prep-Girls 25 3 1 4 0.160 0.0736 0.0736 — —
2016-17 Phillips Academy Andover USHS-W 35 20 22 42 1.200 0.3493 0.3247 — —
2017-18 Andover NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC-W GR 33 12 28 40 1.212
2021-22 Yale D1 ECAC-W SR 34 13 25 38 1.118
2020-21 Yale D1 ECAC-W JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Yale D1 ECAC-W SO 32 15 18 33 1.031
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC-W FR 28 5 12 17 0.607
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2018-19 · Yale
+216.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6836
Forward overall
#252
Forward born in 1999
#469
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.