IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Rodgers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 57 3 2 5 0.088 0.0255 0.0283 — —
2018-19 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 54 11 10 21 0.389 0.1132 0.1171 — —
2019-20 — USHS-W 15 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 45 11 7 18 0.400 0.1164 0.1164 — —
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 60 12 17 29 0.483 0.1407 0.1245 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W SR 32 1 0 1 0.031
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W JR 33 2 2 4 0.121
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7955
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 2003
#2716
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Renee Saltness
Quinnipiac ·
0.029 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendall Williamson
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.