IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddison Achtyl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence USHS-W 21 4 11 15 0.714 0.2079 0.2261 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SR 37 18 8 26 0.703
2024-25 Stonehill D1 NEWHA JR 36 11 5 16 0.444
2023-24 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SO 36 13 10 23 0.639
2022-23 Stonehill D1 NEWHA FR 34 11 7 18 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2022-23 · Stonehill
+173.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 23 comparables)

9%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
91%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3725
Forward overall
#163
Forward born in 2004
#1332
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.