← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey O'Brien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
New York Sirens · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 33 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 29 0 1 1 0.030 0.0138 0.0138
2018-19 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 43 47 36 83 1.930 0.5619 0.5395
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 23 17 31 48 2.087 0.6075 0.6075
2025-26 New York Sirens PWHL 28 7 15 22 0.786
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W GR 41 26 62 88 2.146
2023-24 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W SR 41 23 50 73 1.780
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W JR 41 19 29 48 1.171
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 SO 38 27 28 55 1.447
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 FR 21 2 8 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2020-21 · Wisconsin
+69.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#846
Forward overall
#39
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.