IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexandra Lalonde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 45 17 33 50 1.111 0.3234 0.3234 — —
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 15 21 36 1.161 0.3381 0.3381 — —
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 60 32 39 71 1.183 0.3445 0.3371 — —
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 50 41 47 88 1.760 0.5123 0.4693 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HEA-W JR 39 10 18 28 0.718
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SO 20 4 10 14 0.700
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HEA-W FR 39 8 9 17 0.436
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Northeastern
+22.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1031
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2005
#351
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sam Donovan
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.