Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 34 | 25 | 19 | 44 | 1.290 | 0.4190 | 0.4190 |
| 2021-22 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 26 | 23 | 49 | 1.810 | 0.5879 | 0.5879 |
| 2022-23 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Boston College | HEA-W | JR | 33 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 0.879 |
| 2024-25 | Boston College | HEA-W | SO | 36 | 11 | 25 | 36 | 1.000 |
| 2023-24 | Boston College | HEA-W | FR | 35 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 0.914 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saana Valkama | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG | 0.314 | Vermont |
| Nicole Schammel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG | 0.611 | Minnesota State |
| Brooke Avery | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG | 0.062 | New Hampshire |
| Kelly Pannek | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG | 1.073 | Minnesota |
| Jessie Aney | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG | 0.267 | UConn |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Whitney | 2017-18 · 1.42 PPG | 0.862 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Nina Hudakova | 2022-23 · 1.28 PPG | 0.962 | Wilkes | UCHC |
| Reghan Bork | 2021-22 · 3.07 PPG | 0.400 | Concordia | MIAC |
| Brooke Walters | 2016-17 · 1.72 PPG | 0.714 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Madison Nipper | 2016-17 · 3.42 PPG | 0.360 | New England College | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.