← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mary Leys Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. George's NE-Prep-Girls 22 2 0 2 0.090 0.0558 0.0558
2017-18 St. George's NE-Prep-Girls 23 0 1 1 0.040 0.0248 0.0248
2018-19 St. George's NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. George's School USHS-W 24 6 8 14 0.583 0.1754 0.1754
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA GR 36 2 5 7 0.194
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 32 1 4 5 0.156
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SR 36 4 7 11 0.306
2023-24 St. Michael's College D3 SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2022-23 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA JR 32 3 8 11 0.344
2022-23 St. Michael's College D3 JR 27 1 7 8 0.296
2021-22 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SO 25 2 1 3 0.120
2021-22 St. Michael's College D3 SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2020-21 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5197
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Harvard ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
1.167 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.