Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Shattuck St. Mary's 16U | NE-Prep-Girls | 21 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 1.048 | 0.3403 | 0.3403 |
| 2021-22 | Shattuck St. Mary's 16U | NE-Prep-Girls | 49 | 19 | 36 | 55 | 1.122 | 0.3646 | 0.3967 |
| 2022-23 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.0714 | 0.0714 |
| 2023-24 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0684 | 0.0684 |
| 2024-25 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 20 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.600 | 0.2463 | 0.2463 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Yale | ECAC-W | FR | 30 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.133 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sophia Kunin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG | 0.425 | Wisconsin |
| Taylor Williamson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG | 0.395 | Minnesota |
| Emily Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG | 0.171 | Lindenwood |
| Andrea Renner | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG | 0.167 | Northeastern |
| Brooke Madsen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG | 0.600 | Penn State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rylan Kissel | 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG | 0.577 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Marta Mazzocchi | 2022-23 · 0.90 PPG | 0.727 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Zsofia Pazmandi | 2022-23 · 0.80 PPG | 0.808 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Courtney Moser | 2016-17 · 1.16 PPG | 0.560 | Saint Mary's (MN) | MIAC |
| Bailey Coons | 2010-11 · 1.41 PPG | 0.458 | Becker | — |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.