← New Search ↗ Social Card

Delaney Fleming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Lourdes High (W) USHS-MN-W 17 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Rochester Lourdes High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 0 1 0.043 0.0070 0.0077
2019-20 Rochester Lourdes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 10 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 8 5 13 0.419 0.1221 0.1221
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 60 21 21 42 0.700 0.2038 0.2033
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 52 32 23 55 1.058 0.3079 0.2879
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cornell D1 ECAC-W 33 5 13 18 0.545
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC-W 35 7 8 15 0.429
2023-24 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · Ohio State
-56.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3185
Forward overall
#112
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.