IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michaela Pejzlová Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-04 Country: Czechia
Signed Professionally
HIFK · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 22 17 20 37 1.682 0.6377 0.6377 — —
2021-22 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 21 15 27 42 2.000 0.7584 0.7584 — —
2022-23 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 31 32 50 82 2.645 1.0031 0.7959 — —
2023-24 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 24 30 41 71 2.958 1.1218 0.8551 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 30 8 16 24 0.800
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 40 19 36 55 1.375
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 41 26 29 55 1.341
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 37 11 21 32 0.865

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 26 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#65
Forward overall
#5
Forward born in 1997
#2
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.