← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samantha Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-23 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Boston Pride · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Tabor NE-Prep-Girls 24 3 1 4 0.170 0.0782 0.0782
2020-21 Boston Pride PHF 7 4 1 5 0.714
2021-22 Boston Pride PHF 20 5 7 12 0.600
2022-23 Boston Pride PHF 24 6 8 14 0.583
2023-24 Boston Pride PHF 24 6 8 14 0.583
2024-25 Boston Pride PHF 24 6 8 14 0.583
2025-26 Boston Pride PHF 24 6 8 14 0.583
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Boston University D1 36 17 24 41 1.139
2018-19 Boston University D1 37 25 27 52 1.405
2017-18 Boston University D1 HEA-W 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Boston University D1 HEA-W 35 7 16 23 0.657
2015-16 Boston University D1 HEA-W 39 17 9 26 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2015-16 · Boston University
+896.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9391
Forward overall
#287
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.