IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicole Schammel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Whitecaps · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Red Wing High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 41 14 55 2.200 0.3533 0.3533 — —
2012-13 Red Wing High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 61 43 104 4.160 0.6681 0.6681 — —
2013-14 Red Wing High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 48 38 86 3.440 0.5525 0.5525 — —
2019-20 Minnesota Whitecaps PHF 22 11 14 25 1.136 — — — —
2021-22 Minnesota Whitecaps PHF 17 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 39 16 31 47 1.205
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 38 17 15 32 0.842
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 39 6 6 12 0.308
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 11 11 22 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2014-15 · Minnesota State
+9.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#496
Forward overall
#33
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.