IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carly Bullock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-04 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 23 5 4 9 0.391 0.0628 0.0628 — —
2012-13 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 9 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
2013-14 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 41 14 55 2.200 0.3533 0.3533 — —
2014-15 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 42 29 71 2.840 0.4561 0.4561 — —
2015-16 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 43 13 56 2.333 0.3747 0.3747 — —
2020-21 Linköping HC SDHL 33 18 17 35 1.061 1.2250 1.2250 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SR 33 30 24 54 1.636
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC-W JR 33 21 22 43 1.303
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SO 32 24 8 32 1.000
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC-W FR 32 16 10 26 0.812
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2016-17 · Princeton
+132.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#155
Forward overall
#5
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.