← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Zumwinkle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-23 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Frost · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 13 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734
2013-14 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 11 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670
2014-15 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 34 22 56 2.240 0.3597 0.3597
2015-16 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 20 28 11 39 1.950 0.3132 0.3132
2016-17 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 20 38 15 53 2.650 0.4256 0.4256
2024-25 Minnesota Frost PWHL 22 4 6 10 0.455
2025-26 Minnesota Frost PWHL 29 13 10 23 0.793
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 39 25 36 61 1.564
2020-21 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 20 17 7 24 1.200
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 36 25 20 45 1.250
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 39 25 16 41 1.051
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 38 17 21 38 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2017-18 · Minnesota
+206.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1323
Forward overall
#74
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.