← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayne Lewis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-10 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metropolitan Riveters · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 2 2 0.060 0.0276 0.0276
2014-15 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 21 0 2 2 0.100 0.0460 0.0460
2015-16 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 2 1 2 3 1.500
2020-21 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SR 32 22 13 35 1.094
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 31 19 18 37 1.194
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 31 19 18 37 1.194
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 34 19 24 43 1.265
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 29 9 16 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2015-16 · Sacred Heart
+2504.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14890
Forward overall
#425
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.