IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly Pannek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-29 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Frost · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 24 31 21 52 2.167 0.3480 0.3480 — —
2011-12 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 43 25 68 2.720 0.4368 0.4368 — —
2012-13 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 20 27 42 69 3.450 0.5541 0.5541 — —
2013-14 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 31 46 77 3.080 0.4946 0.4946 — —
2024-25 Minnesota Frost PWHL 30 3 8 11 0.367 — — — —
2025-26 Minnesota Frost PWHL 30 16 17 33 1.100 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 37 16 15 31 0.838
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 39 19 43 62 1.590
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 40 23 26 49 1.225
2014-15 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 41 14 30 44 1.073
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2014-15 · Minnesota
+122.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#652
Forward overall
#29
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.