| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.320 | 0.0514 | 0.0514 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 1.200 | 0.1927 | 0.1927 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 1.333 | 0.2141 | 0.2141 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 1.458 | 0.2342 | 0.2342 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 1.875 | 0.3011 | 0.3011 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 1.304 | 0.2095 | 0.2095 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota Whitecaps | PHF | 22 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.909 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota Whitecaps | PHF | 22 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.909 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota Whitecaps | PHF | 22 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.909 | — | — | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Seattle Torrent | PWHL | 29 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.172 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | UConn | D1 | — | SR | 37 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.784 |
| 2020-21 | UConn | D1 | — | JR | 20 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.500 |
| 2019-20 | UConn | D1 | — | SO | 39 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 0.846 |
| 2018-19 | UConn | D1 | — | FR | 36 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 0.806 |
| 2017-18 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | FR | 38 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 1.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.