IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Nuutinen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-07 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Kiekko-Espoo · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 9 3 4 7 0.778 0.2949 0.2949 — —
2012-13 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 20 14 11 25 1.250 0.4740 0.4740 — —
2013-14 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 25 24 30 54 2.160 0.8191 0.8191 — —
2014-15 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 12 9 16 25 2.083 0.7900 0.7900 — —
2015-16 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 20 28 26 54 2.700 1.0238 1.0238 — —
2020-21 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 6 7 5 12 2.000 0.7584 0.7584 — —
2022-23 Buffalo Beauts PHF 24 4 6 10 0.417 — — — —
2023-24 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 31 28 35 63 2.032 0.7706 0.5684 — —
2024-25 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 30 27 38 65 2.167 0.8216 0.5722 — —
2025-26 Kiekko-Espoo SMLIIGA-W 28 27 36 63 2.250 0.8532 0.5512 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W SR 34 21 19 40 1.177
2018-19 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W JR 30 16 12 28 0.933
2017-18 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W SO 23 8 5 13 0.565
2016-17 North Dakota D1 — — 34 10 9 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.93
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · North Dakota
-39.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 37 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#133
Forward overall
#13
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.