← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anna Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.1156 0.1156
2015-16 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 8 9 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2016-17 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 10 22 0.880 0.1413 0.1413
2017-18 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 18 13 31 1.240 0.1991 0.1991
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SR 33 14 22 36 1.091
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 31 14 10 24 0.774
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 30 11 15 26 0.867
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 30 11 15 26 0.867
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2017-18 · Sacred Heart
+688.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5154
Forward overall
#1034
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.