IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karlie Lund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0514 0.0514 — —
2011-12 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 18 32 1.280 0.2056 0.2056 — —
2012-13 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 23 19 31 50 2.174 0.3491 0.3491 — —
2013-14 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 22 33 55 2.200 0.3533 0.3533 — —
2014-15 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 19 33 52 2.080 0.3340 0.3340 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SR 33 10 16 26 0.788
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC-W JR 32 7 15 22 0.688
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SO 32 21 21 42 1.312
2015-16 Princeton D1 ECAC-W FR 33 17 22 39 1.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.18
2015-16 · Princeton
+304.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1570
Forward overall
#89
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.