Based on 22 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Boston Pride | PHF | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.286 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Leksands IF | SDHL | 31 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 0.774 | 0.9054 | 0.9054 |
| 2022-23 | Toronto Six | PHF | 20 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.700 | N/A | N/A |
| 2023-24 | Toronto Six | PHF | 20 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.700 | N/A | N/A |
| 2024-25 | Ottawa Charge | PWHL | 30 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 0.733 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-26 | Vancouver Goldeneyes | PWHL | 30 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.500 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Maine | HEA-W | SR | 33 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 0.939 |
| 2018-19 | Maine | HEA-W | JR | 31 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 0.774 |
| 2017-18 | Maine | HEA-W | SO | 37 | 16 | 30 | 46 | 1.243 |
| 2016-17 | Maine | HEA-W | FR | 28 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 1.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caitrin Lonergan | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG | 0.892 | Boston College |
| Maria Lindh | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG | 0.306 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelcie Finn | 2011-12 · 2.43 PPG | 0.704 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Brianna Breiland | 2012-13 · 2.70 PPG | 0.633 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Amelia Laskowski | 2023-24 · 1.67 PPG | 1.034 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Kristin Chivers | 2014-15 · 2.00 PPG | 0.862 | Elmira | UCHC |
| Amanda Sergent | 2016-17 · 2.59 PPG | 0.667 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.